Home | View Cart | Shipping | Privacy | Drug Testing Help
To purchase products or request more information please email: info@drug-testing-products.com

drug tests * drug testing * employee drug testing * urine test * marijuana drug test * urine drug test * hair drug test * drug test * drug test kit * saliva drug test * panel drug testing

Pros and Cons of the Various Drug Testing Methods

Urine

Results of a urine test show the presence or absence of specific drugs or drug metabolites in the urine. Metabolites are drug residues that remain in the system for some time after the effects of the drug have worn off. A positive urine test does not necessarily mean the subject was under the influence of drugs at the time of the test. Rather, it detects and measures use of a particular drug within the previous few days.

Hair

Analysis of hair may provide a much longer testing window for the presence of drugs and drug metabolites, giving a more complete drug-use history that goes back as far as 90 days. Like urine testing, hair testing does not provide evidence of current impairment, only past use of a specific drug. Hair testing cannot be used to detect alcohol.

TYPES OF TESTS PROS CONS WINDOW OF DETECTION
URINE
  • Highest assurance of reliable results.
  • Least expensive.
  • Most flexibility in testing different drugs, including alcohol and nicotine.
  • Most likely of all drug-testing methods to withstand legal challenge.
  • Specimen can be adulterated, substituted, or diluted.
  • Limited window of detection.
  • Test sometimes viewed as invasive or embarrassing.
  • Biological hazard for specimen handling and shipping to lab.
  • Typically 1 to 5 days.
  • HAIR
  • Longer window of detection.
  • Greater stability (does not deteriorate).
  • Can measure chronic drug use.
  • Convenient shipping and storage (no need to refrigerate).
  • Collection procedure not considered invasive or embarrassing.
  • More difficult to adulterate than urine.
  • Detects alcohol/cocaine combination use.
  • More expensive.
  • Test usually limited to basic 5-drug panel.
  • Cannot detect alcohol use.
  • Will not detect very recent drug use (1 to 7 days prior to test).
  • Depends on the length of hair in the sample. Hair grows about a half-inch per month, so a 1╫-inch specimen would show a 3-month history.
  • ORAL FLUIDS
  • Sample obtained under direct observation.
  • Minimal risk of tampering.
  • Non-invasive.
  • Samples can be collected easily in virtually any environment.
  • Can detect alcohol use.
  • Reflects recent drug use.
  • Drugs and drug metabolites do not remain in oral fluids as long as they do in urine.
  • Less efficient than other testing methods in detecting marijuana use.
  • Approximately 10 to 24 hours.
  • SWEAT PATCH
  • Non-invasive.
  • Variable removal date (generally 1 to 7 days).
  • Quick application and removal.
  • Longer window of detection than urine.
  • No sample substitution possible.
  • Limited number of labs able to process results.
  • People with skin eruptions, excessive hair, or cuts and abrasions cannot wear the patch.
  • Passive exposure to drugs may contaminate patch and affect results.
  • Patch retains evidence of drug use for at least 7 days, and can detect even low levels of drugs 2 to 5 hours after last use.
  • Sweat Patch

    Another type of drug test consists of a skin patch that measures drugs and drug metabolites in perspiration. The patch, which looks like a large adhesive bandage, is applied to the skin and worn for some length of time. A gas-permeable membrane on the patch protects the tested area from dirt and other contaminants. The sweat patch is sometimes used in the criminal justice system to monitor drug use by parolees and probationers, but so far it has not been widely used in workplaces or schools.

    Oral Fluids

    Traces of drugs, drug metabolites, and alcohol can be detected in oral fluids, the generic term for saliva and other material collected from the mouth. Oral fluids are easy to collect—a swab of the inner cheek is the most common way. They are harder to adulterate or substitute, and collection is less invasive than with urine or hair testing. Because drugs and drug metabolites do not remain in oral fluids as long as they do in urine, this method shows more promise in determining current use and impairment.

    Breath Alcohol

    Unlike urine tests, breath-alcohol tests do detect and measure current alcohol levels. The subject blows into a breath-alcohol test device, and the results are given as a number, known as the Blood Alcohol Concentration, which shows the level of alcohol in the blood at the time the test was taken. In the U.S. Department of Transportation regulations, an alcohol level of 0.04 is high enough to stop someone from performing a safety-sensitive task for that day.

    Copyright http://www.drugtestguide.com